Comments on: Mint chocolate chip ice cream https://bakeschool.com/mint-chocolate-chip-ice-cream/ A website dedicated to baking and the science of baking Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:13:19 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Janice https://bakeschool.com/mint-chocolate-chip-ice-cream/comment-page-1/#comment-42916 Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:10:51 +0000 https://bakeschool.com/?p=26008#comment-42916 In reply to Erika.

Hi Erika,

I'm so glad you enjoyed it! Your notes are very much appreciated. Thank you for taking the time. I will make the changes you suggested!

]]>
By: Erika https://bakeschool.com/mint-chocolate-chip-ice-cream/comment-page-1/#comment-42913 Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:22:58 +0000 https://bakeschool.com/?p=26008#comment-42913

Excellent flavor! I noticed a couple of errors on the recipe.
1. There was nothing in the method about dividing of the whipping cream, which is indicated to be divided in the ingredient list.
2. List the ingredients in the order they will be used (please)
3. There is no indication in the method of when to add the mint extract.
Otherwise, this recipe was pretty easy to follow and my ice cream turned out great.

]]>
By: Janice https://bakeschool.com/mint-chocolate-chip-ice-cream/comment-page-1/#comment-32766 Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:36:25 +0000 https://bakeschool.com/?p=26008#comment-32766 In reply to Pete.

Hah! True! I should probably make it a little more specific! I just don't want readers to cook to a too low temperature because then the base may be watery because less evaporation, but also, if they don't cook it high enough for long enough, there may be more ice crystal formation from the extra water, and it won't technically be "pasteurized" (according to classic pastry techniques). Also, it might be too large a volume to fit the ice cream maker if there's more water...

]]>
By: Pete https://bakeschool.com/mint-chocolate-chip-ice-cream/comment-page-1/#comment-32665 Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:57:29 +0000 https://bakeschool.com/?p=26008#comment-32665 “…at least 83C” for the custard implies there’s no issues going (much) above that. 🙂

]]>